When Finland joined NATO in 2023, the decision was widely understood as a necessary response to danger and a step to increase security by strengthening deterrence. This interpretation may have appeared convincing because a common way of thinking about security is mechanical: more military capability equals more safety. One’s decisions, policies, and military capabilities have no impact on the world. However, the reality is complex. Finland’s decision, NATO’s expansion, Russian reactions, and even the theories used to explain them are all part of one continuous, evolving process. There is no outside vantage point. There is no clean separation between action and interpretation. Everything is connected. [This text was first published by Brave New Europe on 3 April 2026.]
Continue readingDeweaponizing Interdependence
The Trump II administration’s trade wars and framing of the dollar’s reserve status have accelerated concerns about the sustainability of the current monetary and trade system. Against a backdrop of various disintegrative tendencies, our new book Deweaponizing Interdependence: Bringing the Idea of International Clearing Union into the Twenty-First Century reintroduces the concept of an International Clearing Union (ICU) and offers an important overview of critical approaches to the prevailing monetary system. [This blog, written with Jamie Morgan, was first published at the PPE-site on 2 March 2026.]
Continue readingThe possible annexation of Greenland and the future of the EU
I wrote these answers to questions from a reporter from the Turkish news agency Anadolu (AA) on January 7. The central idea is that the EU could cancel the July trade deal with the US. Since few people in Finland or Europe follow Turkish media, I am publishing these answers as a blog.
Continue readingThe attack on Venezuela: the return of spheres of interests and imperialism, or towards a post-hegemonic world system?
The oil tanker hijackings, the US invasion of Venezuela, and the kidnapping of Maduro violate many laws. These include the UN Charter, the law of the sea (especially UNCLOS), and the 1988 Convention on Drug Trafficking. The attack is also problematic for the US’s own political and legal system. The Trump administration acted without congressional authorisation and ignored other legal considerations. In this blog, I consider to what extent the attack only deepens the ongoing retrogression towards traditional imperialism, and to what extent it is more a matter of the old dying at the time when the new cannot yet be born. Many pathological symptoms are evident in such an in-between state. [This text was first published by Brave New Europe on 4.1.2025]
Continue reading
